evaluate your knowledge and skills in the course. It is designed to encourage you to take ownership of your learning, performance and outcomes. This assessment contributes specifically to learning outcomes a, b, c and d. .how the readings, class activities, discussions observations and lectures have changed how you communicate at work orlife2.the things your assignment group did well or not so well, and consider what you could do to improve in future groupwork3.how you will go from here to become a better communicator Value:30%?Due Date: 5:00 pm Friday of Week 11 Assessment topic: Course Topic Reflection

Assessment 4

Assessment Type: Individual Reflection Report– 2,000 words.

Purpose: The individual reflection report allows you to evaluate your knowledge and skills in the course. It is designed to encourage you to take ownership of your learning, performance and outcomes. This assessment contributes specifically to learning outcomes a, b, c and d.

Value:30%?Due Date: 5:00 pm Friday of Week 11 Assessment topic: Course TopicReflection

Assignment Submission: Upload toTurnitin through Moodle. Task details: You are to write a Reflective Journal on:

1.how the readings, class activities, discussions observations and lectures have changed how you communicate at work orlife2.the things your assignment group did well or not so well, and consider what you could do to improve in future groupwork3.how you will go from here to become a bettercommunicator

Assignment Format: A title page – Individual KOI cover sheet, signed. No Abstract or Executive Summary or table of contents is required. This report should have a heading and two or more sub headings for each topic. The written text should be right and left justified and double spaced throughout. Please use a single column format.

A minimum of seven scholarly references in the Harvard Anglia style are required in order to pass this assessment. However, for a high mark, you will need to use many more scholarly references. Only one Internet (www) resources will be allowed. It is very important that you assess the internet resource used for credibility.

Single spaced, font Times New Roman 12pt, Calibri 11pt or Arial 10pt. You are encouraged to use headings and sub-headings along with the use of a table in this assignment.

Turnitin

Assignment Alarm: You can check the assessment’s similarity by submitting it toTurnitin prior to the due date. However, you cannot make a resubmission after the due date, don’t make a mistake in submitting the wrong file. Ensure you do this assignment yourself. We are obliged to mark what is submitted at the due date and time.

Please refer to the marking rubric for details about each marking criterion.

BUS709 COMMUNICATION IN BUSINESS T12026/02/202015:31?PAGE15OF19

*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTYLTD©?ABN: 72 132629979?CRICOS03171A

Approved by KOI Academic Board for T1 2020

BUS709

Assessment 4 Marking Rubric Individual Reflective Journal – 30%

Criteria Fail

(0 – 49%)

Pass (50 – 64%) Credit (65 – 74%) Distinction (75 – 84%) High Distinction (85 – 100%)
Organisation of ideas (10 marks) Disorganisedand incoherent. Shows some attempt toorganise in a logical manner. Showsorganisationand coherence. Carefully and logicallyorganised. Carefullyorganised with logic and imagination.
Clarity of expression (incl. accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation)

(20 marks)

Meaning unclear and/or grammar and/or spelling contain frequent errors. Meaning apparent, but language not always fluent. Grammar and/or spelling contain errors. Language mainly fluent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurate. Language fluent. Grammar and spelling accurate. Fluent writing style appropriate to document. Grammar and spelling accurate.
Understanding of key concepts and issues

(20 marks)

Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the theoretical content raised in the assignment. Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the theoretical content raised in the assignment. Demonstrates a good understanding of the theoretical content raised in the assignment. Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the theoretical content raised in the assignment. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the theoretical content raised in the assignment.
Content and range (25 marks) Lacks evidence of knowledge relevant to the topic. Evidence of limited knowledge of topic. Evidence of factual and/or conceptual knowledge. Reasonable knowledge of topic and an awareness of a variety of ideas and perspectives. Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic presented with depth andrigour.
Personal reflection (25 marks) Lack of personal reflection and little evidence of engagement with assignment task. Some evidence of personal reflection. Shows acceptable level of engagement with topic. Sufficient evidence of personal reflection and engagement with subject area. Good self-awareness and growth and sound engagement with assignment topic. Illustrates self-awareness and growth and reveals in-depth engagement with key issues.
Total mark out of 100
Assessment mark:

?/30

Comment: